<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bort Update to Rails 2.2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/</link>
	<description>Ruby on Rails, Javascript, CSS and Standards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:37:10 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimneath.org/?p=108#comment-915</guid>
		<description>when is Bort for Rails 2.3.2 coming out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when is Bort for Rails 2.3.2 coming out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-820</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 17:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimneath.org/?p=108#comment-820</guid>
		<description>Globalize2 could be a nice addition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Globalize2 could be a nice addition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jing</title>
		<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-809</link>
		<dc:creator>Jing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimneath.org/?p=108#comment-809</guid>
		<description>Nice work! I think the role_requirement is necessary for most projects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work! I think the role_requirement is necessary for most projects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mcxiand</title>
		<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>mcxiand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimneath.org/?p=108#comment-801</guid>
		<description>Hi, im using windows and tried using bort, but i have problems with the encoding. it will have errors like invalid characters?

have you encountered this type of errors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, im using windows and tried using bort, but i have problems with the encoding. it will have errors like invalid characters?</p>
<p>have you encountered this type of errors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petri Wessman</title>
		<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-734</link>
		<dc:creator>Petri Wessman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimneath.org/?p=108#comment-734</guid>
		<description>One more detail: &quot;rake spec&quot; fails after changing REST_AUTH_SITE_KEY (due to fixture data no longer matching, apparently).

What do I have to do after changing the site key to get the rspec test to pass again; in other words, how do I generate the proper changes to spec/fixtures/users.yml?

A rake task to upgrade the site key *and* update the fixture would of course rock, in the future :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more detail: &#8220;rake spec&#8221; fails after changing REST_AUTH_SITE_KEY (due to fixture data no longer matching, apparently).</p>
<p>What do I have to do after changing the site key to get the rspec test to pass again; in other words, how do I generate the proper changes to spec/fixtures/users.yml?</p>
<p>A rake task to upgrade the site key *and* update the fixture would of course rock, in the future :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-728</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 22:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimneath.org/?p=108#comment-728</guid>
		<description>Great work guys! But why removing the role_requirement? Was usefull... surely for a &quot;starter application&quot; more useful then an admin interface xD
Thanks aniway :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work guys! But why removing the role_requirement? Was usefull&#8230; surely for a &#8220;starter application&#8221; more useful then an admin interface xD<br />
Thanks aniway :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aethiolas</title>
		<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>aethiolas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimneath.org/?p=108#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Personally I would think some type of role-rights based interface would be more preferred than role_requirement.  I personally end up using a custom role/right solution but would love to find a plugin that suited my requirements for this and having it in bort would be great.  As for the admin interface, I&#039;m all for it.  Makes one less thing I have to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I would think some type of role-rights based interface would be more preferred than role_requirement.  I personally end up using a custom role/right solution but would love to find a plugin that suited my requirements for this and having it in bort would be great.  As for the admin interface, I&#8217;m all for it.  Makes one less thing I have to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sweet Sweet Bort Luv</title>
		<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-723</link>
		<dc:creator>Sweet Sweet Bort Luv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimneath.org/?p=108#comment-723</guid>
		<description>Admin area and i18n would be fantastic additions.  I find myself adding these into bort then all the time (ESP admin) because they are critical components that almost every site requires. 

Roles are fantastic and one of the reasons i started using bort.  I love but as Gabe said they would be easy to add in... just sux to have to do that!! haha :)

thanks for publishing your fantastic app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admin area and i18n would be fantastic additions.  I find myself adding these into bort then all the time (ESP admin) because they are critical components that almost every site requires. </p>
<p>Roles are fantastic and one of the reasons i started using bort.  I love but as Gabe said they would be easy to add in&#8230; just sux to have to do that!! haha :)</p>
<p>thanks for publishing your fantastic app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 17:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimneath.org/?p=108#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Re role_requirement: Why the motion to remove this?  Yah, it&#039;s totally simple to add in if you need it, but I&#039;m wondering why you end up removing role_requirement for new projects.  Is it not useful?  What are you using to manage security/permissions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re role_requirement: Why the motion to remove this?  Yah, it&#8217;s totally simple to add in if you need it, but I&#8217;m wondering why you end up removing role_requirement for new projects.  Is it not useful?  What are you using to manage security/permissions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petri Wessman</title>
		<link>http://jimneath.org/2008/11/06/bort-update-to-rails-22/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Petri Wessman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimneath.org/?p=108#comment-721</guid>
		<description>Gah, nevermind, I was trying things out with Rails 2.1.2 (which does not work with this version of Bort, it seems).

Upgraded to the 2.2.0 release candidate and the gems in the vendor directory apparently are loaded fine, &quot;rake spec&quot; now passes. Whee.

Still one niggle: it seems to require the rspec gem to be installed system-wide (even though there is a copy of it in the vendor directory). If I remove rspec from the system gems, I get:

rake aborted!
no such file to load -- spec/rake/spectask

if I try to run any rake task.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gah, nevermind, I was trying things out with Rails 2.1.2 (which does not work with this version of Bort, it seems).</p>
<p>Upgraded to the 2.2.0 release candidate and the gems in the vendor directory apparently are loaded fine, &#8220;rake spec&#8221; now passes. Whee.</p>
<p>Still one niggle: it seems to require the rspec gem to be installed system-wide (even though there is a copy of it in the vendor directory). If I remove rspec from the system gems, I get:</p>
<p>rake aborted!<br />
no such file to load &#8212; spec/rake/spectask</p>
<p>if I try to run any rake task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
